WASHINGTON (AP) — A divided Supreme Court ruled Thursday that authorities do not have to provide a quick hearing when they seize cars and other property used in drug crimes, even when the property belongs to so-called innocent owners.
By a 6-3 vote, the justices rejected the claims of two Alabama women who had to wait more than a year for their cars to be returned. Police had stopped the cars when they were being driven by other people and, after finding drugs, seized the vehicles.
Civil forfeiture allows authorities to take someone’s property, without having to prove that it has been used for illicit purposes. Critics of the practice describe it as “legalized theft.”
Justice Brett Kavanaugh wrote for the conservative majority that a civil forfeiture hearing to determine whether an owner will lose the property permanently must be timely. But he said the Constitution does not also require a separate hearing about whether police may keep cars or other property in the meantime.
Related articles:
Related suggestion:
Orioles put outfielder Austin Hays on injured list and cut Peyton BurdickKennedy family endorses Biden in effort to deflate RFK Jr.'s candidacyHybrid rice market expands in AsiaLyrid Meteor Shower peaks tonight with up to 18 shooting stars overhead every hourStalker bodybuilder, 32, is branded a monster by his girlfriend after he smashed up her houseChina unveils data of technically recoverable oil and gas resourcesWorld Championship should move from 'SMELLY' Crucible, insists snooker starAho, Martinook cap Hurricanes' late rally to beat the Islanders for a 2A Washington police officer killed 3 people in 8 yearsREVEALED: Larry Ellison son's David, 41, and his bid to buy media giant Paramount
2.5662s , 6499.1328125 kb
Copyright © 2024 Powered by Divided Supreme Court rules no quick hearing required when police seize property ,World Watchers news portal